Hi, On 28/08/17 19:57, Anton Gladky wrote: > Thanks all for discussion, explanations and investigations! > > @Rene, I propose to close this bug or to wait till upload of libreoffice. > > Next time, when the new coinutils version comes, I will let you know > and coinmp should be tested against the new coinutils. Then it should > probably be uploaded into the sid restricting in BD the minimal coinutils > to guarantee the ABI compatibility like it done for all other dependent > packages [1]. What do you think? > > [1] > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/coinor-cbc.git/tree/debian/control#n8
If there is an ABI break, you must rename the package. Trying to restrict the build-dependencies will have no effect on the dependencies at runtime which is where the ABI actually matters. Thanks, James
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
