On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 04:20:23PM -0500, Carlo Segre wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > >On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 03:12:33PM -0500, Carlo Segre wrote: > >> > >>The biggest problem with non-free packages, which many science-related > >>pacakges would fall into, is that there is no automatic buildd system for > >>them. I have been trying to get pgplot5 rebuilt with no success. > > > >You were not persistent enough ;-) > >Plus it is currently a bad time to ask for builds of non-free packages, > >since there is some backlog on most arches. When I last rebuilt pgplot5 for > >m68k, my machine was probably idling. Can you remind me where to upload > >non-free packages to? > > > > Perhaps I should just be more patient... I am not sure what you mean > about uploading non-free packages. I just uploaded pgplot5 the same way > as any other package, it went into unstable just fine for i386. Rather, i > built a mips binary package and uploaded it the same way as the usual > package with dput. Perhaps that is not the way to upload a "port"?
Ah, I mixed that up with non-US where you had to use a separate upload queue. non-free is mentioned in the control file, so it should be fine. I started the build on m68k and it hasn't failed yet, with a little luck it will be ready tomorrow. Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
