[ I originally sent this by mistake to Christophe only, sorry about the extra noise]
>> Before we kill pkg-science, are people ok with pkg-scicomp >> including e.g. graph theory? I.e. stuff outside the normal >> "numerical" idea that some people have about scientific >> computing? I certainly don't mind, but when I hear "scientific >> computing", I think of numerics. Christophe> I guess you are referring to metis and scotch. These Christophe> software are actually quite important in numerical Christophe> computations for example in mesh partitioning or Christophe> linear algebra. Software/libraries like petsc, Christophe> trilinos, suitesparse for example are using them and Christophe> they are all about numerics. No I was thinking more about software like polymake (http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/polymake) nauty (http://cs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/nauty/) (which is not DFSG free, but for sake illustrating the type of software) or latte (http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~latte/). The question I was trying ask is how broad the pkg-scicomp groups sees its mandate. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]