Le Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:35:01AM +0200, Manuel Prinz a écrit : > > a first draft of the Debian Science Policy is now available in the Debian > Science repository and can be checked out with: >
Hi Manuel and Sylvestre, Nice work :) I have a few comments and questions: - Why is 'Priority: extra' preferred over optional? What are the expected benefits? - It could be useful to request that the fields in debian/control are always used in the same order, to help repository-wide changes. - The match order in the machine-readable copyright format has been reversed compared to the original proposal. Therefore, your example is slightly outdated. - For the license of the packaging work, I recommend to require that its license is not more restrictive than the original source, so that patches do not cause problems when forwarded upstream. > 1. What license should we use for the document? Unless you have concerns that the document can be forked and close-sourced, using GPL is probably too much and will open the possibility of arguments at the GPLv4 transition :) Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy http://charles.plessy.org Wakō, Saitama, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
