Hello, > - It could be useful to request that the fields in debian/control are > always used in the same order, to help repository-wide changes. Yep, good point. We now have to define the order !
> - The match order in the machine-readable copyright format has been > reversed compared to the original proposal. Therefore, your example > is slightly outdated. OK, we will update them. > - For the license of the packaging work, I recommend to require that > its license is not more restrictive than the original source, so that > patches do not cause problems when forwarded upstream. Maybe it is badly placed in the document but there is a sentence about that which says almost the same as you: "The license of the packaging work should either match the license of the upstream sources or have a license that is compatible with the upstream license." Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
