Andreas Tille wrote: >On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:57:22PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: >> Description : graph isomorphism testing library, with command line >> tools
>In which ouf our categories[1] would this package fit best according >to your opinion? I guess nauty in mathematics maybe libnauty-dev in mathematics-dev. I'm not sure if the -dev tasks are intended to be used for only packages that have no real UI, or if splitting the binary packages from a single source package is a reasonable use. >> Unfortunately upstream is not interested in relicensing the package. >:-( >Thanks for working on this (and ping me in case nobody else shows >up as a sponsor) I have also ITP'ed a DFSG free alternative (bliss) that seems quite functional. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=528925. I guess it can also be added to the same task(s). Upstream of polymake has agreed in principle to migrate, but (surprise!) has very little time now. So I think even as a build-dep nauty will be required for one release cycle. And in any case, it is in some sense the standard software for graph isomorphism. Perhaps it is time for a reminder or a link to how tasks work; I confess to not paying enough attention so far. Is it be possible for members of the debian science team to directly edit debian science tasks? All the best, David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
