Andreas Tille wrote: >On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 08:12:09AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
>Currently it is organised that way that you have to be a member of >Blends team on alioth. There is no explicite need for this and it >might also go into the debian-science SVN (but it has to be SVN for >the moment). I feel a bit lazy about moving from the blends repository >and would rather like to add people to this group - but if you think >that's an extra burden just ask me to move. Debian Edu and Debian GIS >have their tasks files in their SVN repositories - all other Blends >source packages are in the blends group. For me, joining the blends group is fine. But in the long run I think moving into debian-science svn would make it more a natural part of the team workflow, rather than something you have to manage/encourage by asking about what task a given new package goes in. Or maybe there is some alioth magic that could make all debian-science members automatic members of blends. Would that be desirable from a blends point of view delegate adding users like that? It doesn't matter so much where the svn is I guess, I'm mainly thinking the extra adminstrative hoop. On a related topic it would be nice if there was some semi-automatic way to smooth the flow of ITPs into the tasks files. Perhaps something along the lines of the Package Entropy Tracker watching the git repos. Perhaps something useful will come out of the pkg-perl teams investigations of git. All the best, David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org