On 02/10/2011 09:10 PM, Michael Banck wrote: >> > If qt3 is really popular with scientific apps, which presumably are slow >> > moving targets which are not esaily /quickly ported to qt4, it should be >> > enough motivation for the people who need qt3 to take on the maintenance, >> > so >> > no need to burden the QA team. You need a piece of software, you do the >> > necessary packaging work - it's that simple, at least in theory. > Reposting on -science as maybe somebody hadn't seen it. > > Anybody still maintaining Qt3 apps?
QtDMM and it will die with the Qt4-only transition. There is QtDMM2 using Qt4, which I yet did not have a closer look at. Steffen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
