> On 02/10/2011 09:10 PM, Michael Banck wrote: >>> > If qt3 is really popular with scientific apps, which presumably are slow >>> > moving targets which are not esaily /quickly ported to qt4, it should be >>> > enough motivation for the people who need qt3 to take on the maintenance, >>> > so >>> > no need to burden the QA team. You need a piece of software, you do the >>> > necessary packaging work - it's that simple, at least in theory. >> Reposting on -science as maybe somebody hadn't seen it. >> >> Anybody still maintaining Qt3 apps?
The qcad package will be removed soon. I have a working package of LibreCAD, a fork which ported it to qt4. http://git.debian.org/?p=debian-science/packages/librecad.git -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
