On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 20:14 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 07/04/11 at 10:25 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > Hi Drew, > > > > just make it clear -- you are talking about > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=mpi-default-dev_conflict_other_implementations.diff;att=1;bug=575259 > > right? > > > > was it tested with packages being rebuilt against patched version at > > least on few platforms?
I'm happy to leave bug #575259 untouched if you suspect the patch might be unreliable. I just want lam gone so packages can autobuild. I have no substantial preference between openmpi and mpich2, unless mpich2 should give the same build problems that lam did. > Also, are you talking about switching to mpich2, or to mpich? mpich > should probably go away too. With my mpich2 maintainer hat, I would be > totally fine with this transition, but I'm currently too busy with my > work on Ruby packaging. So, if someone else wants to push it, feel free > to go ahead. mpich2 of course :) Drew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1302224087.7214.4.camel@pug
