On 10/04/11 at 17:13 +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > This sounds reasonable to me. My only question is, what timeframe could > we expect the openmpi updates (armel, mips[el] [s390?]) to take? Should > we set some deadline at which point we say we can't wait any longer, and > then push a mixed mpi-defaults with mpich2 on armel/mips (or promote > mpich2 on all archs) ? > > A related side question: what are the current pros/cons of openmpi vs > mpich2, aside from architecture support?
The market share for openmpi is currently larger than the one of mpich2, so defaulting to openmpi sounds like a better idea if it can work on all architectures. - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
