On Wed, 18. Jul 15:15, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > In that case we should work with the cbf maintainer and see if the > python binding could be package on its own, do > 1) check that both cbf python binding are equivalent CCTBX provides a more recent version of cbflib. But the python bindings are building with the provided setup.py. It creates a _pycbf.so extension. > 2) found the real homepage of the official pycbf which seems to be part of > cbflib. Could not find anything. Looks like this bindings were developed upstream or at least contributed to upstream. > 2) fill a bug against cbflib package to add the a python-pycbf package. (it > seems thaht pycbf is available from cbflib source package). Just did that: Bug#681997 > 4) do not build pycbf from cctbx I'll write a patch to skip the build. > 5) one of you sumerize all this in the wiki once we are clear about this > problem ? Already on my todo list.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
