On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:05:15 +0200
Radostan Riedel <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 19. Jul 13:50, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> > In that case no need to bother with this we will remove the pycbf when
> > repacking
> :D Just wrote a patch for that. Anyway I just found a bug in the
> use_system_libs
> patch. Libscitbx_boost_python was linked against boost_python not
> boost_python-py*. I fixed that and now we are also building this lib as
> libscitbx_boost_python-py*. It's good I manage to get the install targets to
> work. This way and with Baptistes work on distutils we can leave the setup.py
> to
> do the work for us ;). The rules file should now only look like this:
>
> %:
> dh $@ --with python2
:)) fantastic, I like this simple rules file.
>
> I'm just testing for bugs and push my code later...
> Slowly I'm getting used to their build system and scons :)
Then it will be possible to polish the patch series and propose them
for adoption to the upstream. :))
"I love it when a plan comes together"
Cheers
Fred
--
GPG public key 4096R/4696E015 2011-02-14
fingerprint = E92E 7E6E 9E9D A6B1 AA31 39DC 5632 906F 4696 E015
uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel <[email protected]>
GPG public key 1024D/A59B1171 2009-08-11
fingerprint = 1688 A3D6 F0BD E4DF 2E6B 06AA B6A9 BA6A A59B 1171
uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel <[email protected]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
