On 8 October 2016 at 20:01, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: | I couldn't agree more. I'm a cdbs fan, and some of my packages I maintain with | neither cdbs nor dh. So I was _very_ happy to find out cdbs was the tool used | by many r-cran packages, when I started packaging r-cran stuff. Don't get me | wrong: I am happy we now can use dh to build r-cran packages: more choice is | always welcome. So: thanks a lot Gordon and Dylan for your work. I however | won't immediately start converting my r-cran packages from cdbs to dh-r.
Spot on, and agreed. Andreas et al did well with the updates to r-cran.mk, and the cdbs approach is serving us well -- but needs an update. dh-r may fit that bill. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | [email protected]
