On 4 January 2017 at 15:50, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote:

> as in every release cycle I'm trying to verify that every package
> maintained in Debian Science team is properly categorised in our Blends
> tasks.  If a package is just a predependency for some other scientific
> software I can add it to a blacklist of packages that should not show
> up in the Debian Science metapackages explicitly.



giella-sme and everything built from hfst, hfst-ospell, lttoolbox fit in
linguistics, given that there isn't a linguistics-dev task.

giella-core and giella-sme-dev should just be hidden, as they're primarily
for build-depends.

-- Tino Didriksen

Reply via email to