Thank you very much for the upload Anton! cheers, Steve
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:41 PM Anton Gladky <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > I have uploaded all packages. If they will be broken in the > future and no upstream support available, they just need to > be removed. You have done work, why to loose it at least right > now.... > > Thanks for contribution! > > Anton > > Am Di., 14. Apr. 2020 um 15:51 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair > <[email protected]>: > > > > Hi Anton, > > > > Thanks for checking the package. > > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 7:48 AM Anton Gladky <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Stephen, > > > > > > I started from keras yesterday, made some minor changes. > > > But it seems some tests are failing: > > > > > > ========================= 14 failed, 812 passed, 252 skipped, 87 > > > warnings in 3054.59 seconds ========================= > > > > > > Please check, whether they can be skipped or the tolerance > > > should be increased. > > > > This is similar to the result I get if I run the tests without > > including the updated keras-preprocessing and keras-applications > > packages in my schroot, so I wonder if that's what happened. > > However, I realized I forgot to *require* these updated packages by > > increasing the versions in debian/control, so now I have done so. > > Now on a fresh schroot without the updates the package fails to build, > > with the updates it builds and passes tests for me. > > I supplied the updated .debs using --extra-package options to sbuild, > > as well as to autopkgtest. > > > > I have pushed a few commits on salsa master. > > > > That said, as of this month keras outside of Tensorflow is now > > end-of-life, so I am not sure if it is worth keeping these packages in > > debian: > > > > https://github.com/keras-team/keras/blob/master/README.md > > > > > Bugs present in multi-backend Keras will only be fixed until April 2020 > > > (as part of minor releases). > > > > Perhaps a last update while things are still working, but removal on > > breakage? Or better to just remove it entirely? > > With theano also being end of life things are looking shaky. > > > > regards, > > Steve > > > > > > > Am Sa., 21. März 2020 um 15:40 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair > > > <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > Dear Science team, > > > > > > > > I decided to check up on my packages and found that there are errors > > > > that have cropped up due to recent updates to Python and GCC. I > > > > noticed that they will be autoremoved from testing soon, so I am > > > > looking for a sponsor to upload some updates. > > > > > > > > In particular keras and siconos, but keras is more urgent as it will > > > > be autoremoved on Monday. And, I am still working on fixing a problem > > > > with swig4.0 in the siconos package. > > > > > > > > So, the following packages have been updated in salsa repositories: > > > > > > > > science-team/keras > > > > science-team/keras-applications > > > > science-team/keras-preprocessing > > > > > > > > Unfortunately my sponsor is no longer available, so I am looking for a > > > > new sponsor to check and upload these packages. > > > > > > > > Note: the salsa CI fails for keras because it does not use the updated > > > > keras-applications and keras-preprocessing, I am not sure how to make > > > > that work. > > > > > > > > But, it is building and testing successfully on my machine. > > > > > > > > Would someone be willing to sponsor an upload of these packages? > > > > > > > > kind regards, > > > > Steve > > > >
