Hi Stephen, I have disabled i386 build [1] and reduced the size of salsa-build binaries [2]. Now it builds fine in pipeline and I have uploaded the package.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/siconos/-/commit/8aca640c2743655e87aa181ddfd153f51e6f58e7 [2] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/siconos/-/commit/9a836cee37a46e20721ab33871f55b54e6e953dc Best regards Anton Am Sa., 23. Jan. 2021 um 14:48 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair <radars...@gmail.com>: > > Hi Anton, > > Thanks, last time I tried to use the salsa pipeline for this package, > it was not possible because the build produced too much log output and > failed for that reason. > It seems that in your attempt, it actually makes it all the way to the > end; I'm actually not clear on what "fails", it actually succeeds > building and testing the package, but ends with, > > > Uploading artifacts as "archive" to coordinator... failed > > context=artifacts-uploader error=invalid argument > > I have no idea what arguments to what program are invalid here, but it > seems to have to do with the pipeline process and not the package > itself. > > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/siconos/-/jobs/1367137 > > For the i386 build, it fails unfortunately simply because the machine > runs out of memory. (The build annoyingly requires upwards of 7 GB of > memory while compiling the SWIG bindings; part of the motivation for > wanting to distribute a pre-compiled package!) However to be honest I > am not sure siconos works properly on 32-bit architectures anyway. > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/siconos/-/jobs/1367138 > > As for other architectures, there is a bug on arm64 that I have been > trying to fix but it is not an easy one. In the meantime the package > is very useful for x86_64 users, who are in the majority. > > regards, > Steve > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 10:36 PM Anton Gladky <gl...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Stephen, > > > > I have enabled the salsa-pipeline on siconos package and it seems > > fails to build currently [1]. Could you please take a look and let me know, > > whether it is ready to be uploaded. > > > > Thanks > > > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/siconos/-/pipelines > > > > Anton > > > > Am Mi., 20. Jan. 2021 um 22:46 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair > > <radars...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > If there still is time, there is a minor version upstream update to > > > the siconos package looking for a sponsor: > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/siconos/ > > > > > > siconos (4.3.1+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > > . > > > * New upstream release. > > > * Rebase patches: > > > + Remove upstreamed patch to FindLAPACK.cmake. > > > * Update policy version 4.5.1. > > > * Update debhelper version 13. > > > * Add missing symbols for numerics. > > > * Change architecture for siconos and siconos-mechanics-tools to all. > > > * Add debian/upstream/metadata. > > > * Replace debian/compat with debhelper-compat package. > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > Steve > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 9:27 PM Anton Gladky <gl...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear members of Debian Science Team, > > > > > > > > we are approaching to a new stable release freeze. If youhave some > > > > packages to be sponsored, please let us know. > > > > > > > > I have a very limited time, but I will try to review/sponsor someof > > > > packages. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > > > > > > Anton > > > >