Re: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3

[Nilesh Patra]

On 11 November 2021 5:44:09 am IST, Drew Parsons <dpars...@debian.org> wrote:
>On 2021-11-10 20:19, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
>> Source: pandas
>> 
>> On 10/11/2021 17:14, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> pandas is lagging behind upstream by several versions.  I guess we
>>> should try to get in sync with upstream a bit more.
>> 
>> Yes, but please don't upload this yet: it's common for a pandas
>> upgrade to break reverse dependencies.
>
>
>If the new pandas builds successfully, then certainly upload it to 
>experimental first.  We can test dependencies from there.

That makes sense, but other than that, I'd really recommend also to build the 
reverse-"build"-deps with ruby-team/meta or ratt.

Uploading to experimental and checking Britney's pseudoexcuses would only 
warrant for failing autopkgtests in other packages because of new pandas.

Regards,
Nilesh