Previously Christopher W. Curtis wrote: > Is the reason for disabling SysRq sinply the same (ability to reboot, > etc) or do you think there could be an exploitable condition with the > information given? SysRq is very good for killing a console lock such as vlock.. Wichert. -- ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions] Christopher W. Curtis
- Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions] Adam Heath
- Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions] Alvin Oga
- Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions] Christopher W. Curtis
- Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions] Thor
- Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions] Mark Janssen
- Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions] Daniel Burrows
- Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versi... Nathan Paul Simons
- Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all v... Christopher W. Curtis
- Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [... Wichert Akkerman
- Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: auto... Alexander Hvostov
- Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: ... Wichert Akkerman
- Sheesh .. talk about b... Martin Bogomolni
- Re: Sheesh .. talk abo... Christopher W. Curtis
- Re: Sheesh .. talk abo... Alexander Hvostov
- Re: Sheesh .. talk abo... Christopher W. Curtis
- Re: Sheesh .. talk abo... monte
- Re: Sheesh .. talk abo... L. Besselink
- Re: Sheesh .. talk abo... Christopher W. Curtis
- Re: Sheesh .. talk abo... Christopher W. Curtis

