Nuno Faria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I haven't noticed any. I think that the original goal of pinging a > broadcast adress is to know which machines are on that network. When you > disable it, you just stop "announcing" your presence when someone asks > "who is on this network?". It is a service or utility that no longer > exists but is it that useful? It was never universal anyhow, so it wasn't useful before. Now it's not only not useful, but because of smurf attacks, it's harmful. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- icmp: echo reply? Am I being attacked? Nuno Faria
- RE: icmp: echo reply? Am I being attacked? John Vivian
- Re: icmp: echo reply? Am I being attacked? Michel Verdier
- Re: icmp: echo reply? Am I being attacked? Nuno Faria
- Re: icmp: echo reply? Am I being attacke... Michael Stone
- Re: icmp: echo reply? Am I being att... Nuno Faria
- Re: icmp: echo reply? Am I bein... Michael Stone
- Re: icmp: echo reply? Am I ... Micah Anderson
- Re: icmp: echo reply? A... Nuno Faria
- Correction to Re: icmp:... Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Correction to Re: icmp: echo reply? ... Nuno Faria
- RE: icmp: echo reply? Am I being attacked? John Vivian
- Re: icmp: echo reply? Am I being attacked? Nathan Valentine
- Re: icmp: echo reply? Am I being attacke... Nuno Faria
- Re: icmp: echo reply? Am I being attacke... Tollef Fog Heen
- Requests to port 0 John McCullough
- Re: Requests to port 0 Bradley M Alexander

