On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 10:09:23AM +0100, Michel D�nzer wrote: > > So 0620 might be better, with /dev/fb in group video or a dedicated group. that seems more reasonable. > This is on a SuSE 6.4 system BTW: > > crw-rw---- 1 root video 29, 0 Mar 11 2000 /dev/fb0 this is broken IMO, it allows all members of group video to grab a copy of the current framebuffer contents. 620 is safer. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
- /dev/fb* permissions, local DoS Ethan Benson
- Re: /dev/fb* permissions, local DoS hpknight
- Re: /dev/fb* permissions, local DoS Samu
- Re: /dev/fb* permissions, local DoS Michel D�nzer
- Re: /dev/fb* permissions, local DoS Ethan Benson
- Re: /dev/fb* permissions, local DoS Philipe Gaspar
- Re: /dev/fb* permissions, local DoS Ethan Benson
- Re: /dev/fb* permissions, local ... Michael Schmitz
- Re: /dev/fb* permissions, local ... Michel D�nzer
- Re: /dev/fb* permissions, lo... Ethan Benson
- Re: /dev/fb* permissions, lo... Michel D�nzer
- Re: /dev/fb* permissions, local DoS Michael Schmitz
- Re: /dev/fb* permissions, local DoS Chris Leishman
- Re: /dev/fb* permissions, local DoS Michel D�nzer
- Re: /dev/fb* permissions, local DoS Chris Leishman
PGP signature
