Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Debsums seems to help a little bit - you can expect to catch some less-clueful > > intruders with it, but it doesn't help in general. > > debsums just uses md5sums which can be manipulated on the one hand and > on the other hand you modify binaries so that the md5sum will still be > the same. So you've effectively broken MD5 in a way that would yield useful results (ie would allow you to replace a specific binary with another specific binary, not with some more or less random garbage). How came it that you weren't prominently mentionend in this month's cryptogram? -- SIGSTOP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Rene Mayrhofer
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Christian Kurz
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Colin Phipps
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Rene Mayrhofer
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Peter Cordes
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Carey Evans
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Ethan Benson
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Peter Cordes
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Peter Eckersley
- Re: Debian audititing tool? dginsburg
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Rainer Weikusat
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Christian Kurz
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Christian Kurz
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Rainer Weikusat
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Christian Kurz
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Pavel Minev Penev
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Daniel Ginsburg
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Peter Cordes
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Christian Kurz
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Daniel Ginsburg
- Re: Debian audititing tool? David Wright

