> I think that has a lot to do with the fact that they don't explicitly say > to run something else, or give a URI for a different mail client. A news > story that said, "... your email is insecure ... run this to make it better > http://debian.org/ :)", might get some people using non-outlook, esp if the > URI was for a decent windoze email client instead of a whole new OS :) (I've > never checked email from 'doze in my life, except by ssh, but I assume such > a beast must exist...). A bunch of ppl (who can without getting fired) should make their mail/list servers attach that message to the bottom of all emails passing through that are generated by extremely unsecure clients (like this one)! ;) GBY -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Philippe BARNETCHE
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Jim Breton
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? A . L . Meyers
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Philippe BARNETCHE
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Matthew Sherborne
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? A . L . Meyers
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Mike Renfro
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Matthew Sherborne
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Ethan Benson
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Peter Cordes
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Matthew Sherborne
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Ethan Benson
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Bradley M Alexander
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Mostyn Bramley-Moore
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Tollef Fog Heen
- Re: ISPs offering security A . L . Meyers
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Steve Robbins
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Antti Tolamo

