this stuff can also be controlled using hosts.deny and hosts.allow. so
then any inetd prog will do!
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 09:21:56AM +0200, Sebastiaan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found out that rlinetd seems like a great replacement for inetd, because
> it lets you choose which services may be available for the outside world
> and which only for the inner network. So, standard services like echo,
> daytime, chargen, ftp, etc. are only available for the LAN, while it is
> not possible to connect to these ports from the internet.
>
> But, how secure is this? Is it really what it seems?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Sebastiaan
>
>
>
> --
> NT is the OS of the future. The main engine is the 16-bit Subsystem
> (also called MS-DOS Subsystem). Above that, there is the windoze 95/98
> 16-bit Subsystem. Anyone can see that 16+16=32, so windoze NT is a
> *real* 32-bit system.
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Jason Thomas Phone: +61 2 6257 7111
System Administrator - UID 0 Fax: +61 2 6257 7311
tSA Consulting Group Pty. Ltd. Mobile: 0418 29 66 81
1 Hall Street Lyneham ACT 2602 http://www.topic.com.au/
PGP signature
