On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 07:46, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031130 21:40]: > > On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 05:10, "Milan P. Stanic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 11:24:43PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > > > > It's a pity that the developers of other security systems didn't get > > > > involved, it would be good to have a choice of LIDS, HP's system, > > > > DTE, and others in the standard kernel. > > > > > > LIDS uses LSM in 2.5/2.6 kernel series, IIRC. > > > > LIDS does not appear to be in 2.6 at all. > > It seems that there are at least patches for 2.6, see > http://www.lids.org/ (or http://lsm.immunix.org/lsm_modules.html )
The Immunix site is way out of date, they don't have a 2.4.x patch later than 2.4.20 or a 2.5 patch later than 2.5.72 in the download section (and no support for 2.6.x at all). As for having patches for 2.6, it would be more convenient for everyone if they would submit them to Linus. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
