Hi Ethan! On Sat, 29 Apr 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > mutt thinks:
> > > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Apr 30 03:33:11 2000) --]
> > > gpg: Signature made Sun Apr 30 02:17:24 2000 CEST using DSA key ID
> > > 2C447AFC
> > > gpg: BAD signature from "Ethan R. Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> > > [-- End of PGP output --]
> >
> > What might be the reason?
>
> that is interesting, the message that came back to me verified so it
> could not be a mail system garbling... what MUA do you use? do you
> have any procmail recipies that might be tinkering with messages?
Your message had a Good Sig. Unfortunatly Pollywog included your sig
attachtment when replying and it's clear that the sig to your original
message did not work with the reply :)
yours,
peter
--
PGP encrypted messages prefered.
http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~ppalfrad/
pgplRmBLYaUlq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
