Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005, Sam Morris wrote:
> > Is the version in stable too high, or is the version in stable/updates
> > too low? :)
>
> I think packages never leave from security.d.o.
In cvs you see the result of the major fuckup of security.debian.org I was
complaining about loudly during the release. The version for woody ended
up in sarge. Since the version number is lower than the version in sarge
in the main archive, you can safely ignore it.
On security.debian.org:
klecker!joey(pts/0):~> elmo -e -s cvs
cvs oldoldstable 1.10.7-9.2 alpha arm i386 m68k powerpc sparc
source
cvs oldstable 1.11.1p1debian-13 alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips
mipsel powerpc s390 sparc source
cvs stable 1.11.1p1debian-11 alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64
m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc source
In the main archive:
spohr!joey(pts/13):~> elmo -e cvs
cvs oldstable 1.11.1p1debian-10 alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips
mipsel powerpc s390 sparc source
cvs stable 1:1.12.9-13 alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips
mipsel powerpc s390 sparc source
cvs testing 1:1.12.9-15 alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips
mipsel powerpc s390 sparc source
cvs unstable 1:1.12.9-14 hurd-i386
cvs unstable 1:1.12.9-15 alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips
mipsel powerpc s390 sparc source
Gruesse,
Joey
--
Testing? What's that? If it compiles, it is good, if it boots up, it is perfect.
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
