James Strandboge wrote:
> In reviewing the changelog and source for gtk+2.0, CVE-2005-3186 and
> CVE-2005-2975 are explicitly mentioned (and have patches in
> debian/patches). However, CVE-2005-2976 is not mentioned in the
> changelog and does not have a separate patch in debian/patches, though
> it is mentioned in the DSA. Is this an oversight in the changelog or
> was the patch not included?
Gtk+2.0 from Sarge is not affected by CVE-2005-2976, see #339431 for more
information. It's mentioned because it applies to Woody.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]