On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 04:47:46PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:06:23AM +0000, Bastian Blank wrote: > > If you want to be correct, you can't use linux-source. So the security > > team have to support another kernel source. > > A kernel-patch package that applies on top of the kernel team's > linux-source is the approach I'd suggest. But to reiterate, if > something in a kernel update causes the patch to no longer apply, I > would want to have a reliable contact (hopefully 2 people) whom we can > call upon for assistance.
If the lustre thingy is so important, why not add them as another 'subarch' (do we already have a better name for those ? 'variant' maybe or something), in the same way the vserver or xen images are done ? This would mean for the lustre-folk to join the kernel team though, and an engagement from them to stay active and so on. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
