On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's no big difference in using hunspell and myspell, except that hunspell > dictionaries > then will also work. And you show that hunspell is used so the security team > knows > that mozilla needs to be rebuilt (which probably won't happen, no one ever > found a security bug > in either hunspell or myspell). And in any case, there's already enchant and > openoffice.org building > with static hunspell (openoffice.org does build far longer than ice*)
How does the security team feel about having to rebuild iceape, iceweasel, icedove (you forgot to file a bug on icedove), OOo and enchant if there happens to be a security bug in hunspell ? How do buildds feel to have to rebuild iceape, iceweasel, icedove, OOo and enchant for every hunspell upload ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
