> Debian packages... But let me qualify my statement. "Bind mounts are > just an aliasing mechanism in default kernels as distributed with any > major distribution I looked at." Satisfied? Nope, they are not an aliasing mechanism, otherwise it would be impossible to do the thing you've just seen.
> > because "noone would use that", and "that was linux behaviour for years > > and noone complained yet". > The curse of backwards compatibility. Coming from somebody who routinely > breaks ABIs... AFAIK noone ever mentioned any problem with backwards compatibility (ie, noone mounts stuff with ,ro and then uses it as rw). > ... and you filed a bug to have them included in the Debian kernel It IS included in debian kernels, talk to debian-kernel, they maintain it: Linux abc 2.6.18-3-vserver-686 #1 SMP Thu Nov 23 23:10:59 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-vserver-686 Priority: optional Section: admin Installed-Size: 49716 Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team <[email protected]> Architecture: i386 > builds? After first packaging them as a Debian kernel patch package? I are you attacking me for not being annoying enough? I'm so sorry. -- Dariush Pietrzak, Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
