Hi, I noticed that the latest OpenOffice.org security update in Etch (version 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7etch1, which fixed DSA 1307) depends on libneon25 whereas the previous Etch version (2.0.4.dfsg.2-5etch1) depended instead on libneon26. Are changes in the depended package names, which require a dist-upgrade, in security updates considered a bug? If so, should I bother filing it?
(For what it's worth, OOo packages in testing and unstable depend on libneon25.) regards, -- Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/ Princeton University GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
