Hi Steve, * Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-07 20:26]: > On Fri Dec 07, 2007 at 18:41:35 +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > > > What about those, are they unimportant? > > They are still present in the etch code. I stumbled > > upon them while preparing a testing-security upload. > > Uknown. I used the patch provided by Theodore Tso, which he > is/was planning on using for Sid/Ubuntu.
Oh ok. > If there are missing bits then we'll need to reissue the update, > but right now I believed the patch was as complete as it needed > to be. Ok, I am waiting for his reply, I attached my patch to the bug report in unstable. From what I see every multiplication with fs->blocksize needs to be checked, all of these are coming from the file system. Let's see what he does :) http://people.debian.org/~nion/nmu-diff/e2fsprogs-1.40.2-1_1.40.2-1+lenny1.patch YFYI this is the patch I used for testing-security. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgp7nInBmG6BX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
