Hi, [removed some of the cc:s]
On Sunday 13 April 2008 02:23, Andrea Barisani wrote:
> We already agreed that CC-BY-NC is not open enough, that's why we will
> consider CC-BY.
>
> I believe that license address your concerns, right?
If its CC-BY 3.0, yes. 2.5 is not good enough, afaik ;)
regards,
Holger
pgp1XEL5AZvGr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
