On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 07:29, Frank Lanitz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:15:30 -0500 "Jim Popovitch" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Bah!! Headers change over time. The simple and easy way to solve >> OoO problems is for vacation responders to only reply to From:/Sender: >> if (and only if) To: == $recipient. > > This will not work since you got e.g. in Exchange virtuell recipients
Virtual recipients shouldn't be a problem. The vacation responder (no matter where it exist in the process) shouldn't respond if To: != $recipient (virtual recipient or not). > and I know people that really likes to register on ML etc. with these > addresses on the one hand and setting these messages on the other side. I fail to see how that figures into the OoO equation. MLs *don't* want OoO replies. ;-) > To avoid such things the first step needs to be done on user side e.g. > forcing them to create folders for lists and setting such rules only > folder wide. Huh!?!?!? -Jim P. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
