On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 18:46:33 +0300 Riku Valli <[email protected]> wrote:
> Konqueror isn't solution, because most websites check you browser > strings and uses flash, javascript and so on. Yes, i know at i can > change these strings, but most in cases this isn't enough if i like > use this website. Unfortunately, there are not much free software web browsers that support all new features. AFAIK Mozilla and probably Chromium (I haven't been using it). $ apt-cache search web.browser | grep -i "web.browser" | grep -vE "(^lib|amule|addon|plugin|man pages|net|extension|unit|Perl|intro|IRC|Myth|-(data|dbg|common|dev))" | sort arora - simple cross platform web browser chimera2 - Web browser for X chromium - Google's open source chromium web browser conkeror - keyboard focused web browser with Emacs look and feel dillo - Small and fast web browser epiphany-browser - Intuitive GNOME web browser ezmlm-browse - Web browser for ezmlm-idx archives hv3 - Lightweight web browser iceweasel - Web browser based on Firefox konqueror - advanced file manager, web browser and document viewer links2 - Web browser running in both graphics and text mode links - Web browser running in text mode luakit - A fast and small web browser extensible by Lua midori - fast, lightweight graphical web browser rekonq - KDE web browser based on Webkit surf - simple web browser wapua - Web browser for WAP WML pages xxxterm - Minimalist's web browser > When you used backports i think lot of peoples are quite confused, > because apt-cache show package shows 2 and sometimes 3 (user used 3 > party repo exm. deb-multimedia) same programs and only difference is > version number Well. yes, it's a bit confusing. To really find out which repo contains which version you have to extract versions from /var/lib/apt/lists/*Packages. > How ordinary user can handle this? apt-get install package refuses > install latest version and when they understand how to install latest > version. They installed lot of packages from backports and broke their > installation. I am not a Debian developer, but this looks to me like a bad backport. If backporter didn't lower versions of dependencies to versions from stable, then such conditions may occur. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
