On Sat, May 31, 2014, at 12:39 AM, Michael Stone wrote: > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:32:59AM +1000, Alfie John wrote: > >I'm definitely wanting to engage in serious discussion. I'm an avid > >Debian user and am wanting to protect its users. This *is* the Debian > >security mailing list after all right? All I was trying to do is ask > >questions as to why it is currently not being HTTPS-enforced and I > >got flamed for it. > > Well, you haven't shown any sign of having studied the publically > available documentation or checked the public archives relating to the > design decisions. Yes it's the debian-security mailing list, but that > doesn't mean that it's scalable for debian to provide a personal > walkthrough of the entire package signing architecture for everyone > who sends an email to the list, does it?
I haven't read the docs. And you right, it's not a scalable solution. Sorry for asking questions. Alfie -- Alfie John [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
