Can anyone please delete him from this mailing list? This has NOTHING to do with any security relevanted stuff... so please stop it guys!
2016-07-16 16:15 GMT+02:00 Kyle Lussier <k...@countervaillance.com>: > > CONFIDENTIAL > > Lee - > > Thank you. The questions here are a part of an overall investigation > which involved peoples identities, people faking identities, suicides, > mental health, the personal wealth of engineers that contribute greatly > to society (and are not rewarded financially for such), personal > security > issues (core engineers being abused by law enforcement, police and/or > other actors to compromise infrastructure), and many other things. > > I request people put "extra mental bandwidth" into responses to reduce > errors and increase accuracy. I have not monitored Debian > Founder/Leadership > issues personally, but I am now. > > * Most people here agree that this is accurate "Ian Murdock was a > founder > of Debian and his involvement was reduced after 1998". > > * "Ian Murdock" was a real person that committed suicide, in general > compliance with the following: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/07/ian_murdock_autopsy/ > > * "Ian Murdock" is NOT "Ian Jackson" which shows up in the Wayback > engine > and these are two separate people. > > Is the above accurate, yes or no? > > Does anyone know of any hard material / empirical information that would > falsify and/or counter the accuracy of the above statements? > > Kyle > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: "Ian Murdock" Death > From: <lpack...@leenux.org.uk> > Date: Sat, July 16, 2016 6:58 am > To: Kyle Lussier <k...@countervaillance.com>, Norbert Kiszka > <norb...@linux.pl>, "debian-security@lists.debian.org" > <debian-security@lists.debian.org> > Cc: Kyle Lussier <k...@countervaillance.com>, Michael > <mikethomp...@gmx.co.uk>, Salvatore Bonaccorso <car...@debian.org> > > Kyle, > > If you’d of done your research (which you clearly haven’t) then > you’d know that Ian was the founder and was not the leader of the > organisation from 1998. Sorry but this isn’t a ‘real’ > investigation. If it was you’d of done your research. Coming on to > this mailing list and behaving the way you are is not appropriate. I > suggest you take this to a more appropriate list because this isn’t > it. > > Regards, > Lee > > > >
