Ian Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > jade (1.2.1-25) unstable; urgency=low > > . > > * fix a bug introduced in last version where symlink for SP-supplied > > declarations were not properly created in /usr/lib/sgml, instead the > > blob character was created (oops!) > > closes: #124251, #125913, #127630 > > BTW, why are these symlinks needed at all? Of the packages that > provide SGML stuff and have transitioned to /usr/share/sgml, only sp > and sgml-data seem to maintain such symlinks.
Adam wanted to keep them for backwards-compatibility. In a way this does make sense, since we introduce the move from /usr/lib/sgml to /usr/share/sgml in woody. I expect these can be removd in woody+1. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] home page: http://people.debian.org/~ardo GnuPG fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
