Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ian Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > jade (1.2.1-25) unstable; urgency=low > > > . > > > * fix a bug introduced in last version where symlink for SP-supplied > > > declarations were not properly created in /usr/lib/sgml, instead the > > > blob character was created (oops!) > > > closes: #124251, #125913, #127630 > > > > BTW, why are these symlinks needed at all? Of the packages that > > provide SGML stuff and have transitioned to /usr/share/sgml, only sp > > and sgml-data seem to maintain such symlinks. > > Adam wanted to keep them for backwards-compatibility. In a way this does > make sense, since we introduce the move from /usr/lib/sgml to /usr/share/sgml > in woody. I expect these can be removd in woody+1.
Yes. I kept them for folks who have to maintain documentation that builds in Potato as well as woody. Me, for example. :) -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
