[CC added to [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Frederic Schutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - XHTML 1.0 Second edition, > http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xhtml1-20020801/ > - XHTML 1.1, http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/ > - SVG, http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/ > > Do you think they could be added to the sgml-data package ? I imagine that > the answer should be yes for the first 2 -- but I don't know much about > SVG. XHTML 1.0 is in sgml-data. You are saying it's an outdated version and should be updated? As for XHTML 1.1, see bugs 139058 (WNPP) and the improperly closed 89217. I am not willing to add additional large complex DTDs into sgml-data. XHTML should be packaged separately; in fact, I would prefer if someone would do this, taking both XHTML 1.0 and XHTML 1.1 so I can remove XHTML 1.0 from sgml-data. As for SVG, is it small and simple enough that it's silly to package it separately? I guess so. If it should be in sgml-data, please file a wishlist on sgml-data requesting it be added; if it should be it's own package, file a request as appropriate on WNPP (reportbug can help with WNPP requests). We really do need a volunteer to package XHTML. If no one volunteers, I can do it, but I'm not a good candidate since I don't use XHTML. OTOH, DTD packages are damn easy to maintain and change infrequently, and I have a lot of experience with them. > I'm happy to fill in a wishlist bug against sgml-data if you want me to do > so -- but I first wanted to have your opinion on this. If you think they > can be added, do you have and idea how long it could take ? SVG is indeed rather small and won't take long. XHTML 1.1, I can't say. > Oh, and just in case you're interested in the W3C validator, > http://www.mathgen.ch/debian/unstable contains the package and the sources > (the dependancies are for testing, but Perl 5.8 should "Provide" > everything that is needed so it should work on unstable -- otherwise, any > comment welcome !) Nice. Let me know any other things you find in my packages (esp sgml-data) which could be better. Generally filing bugs is fine, but in the issue you raise here, I'm glad you asked in email first... -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
