Le 08 Dec 2002 16:04:25 -0600, tu as ecrit : >XHTML 1.0 is in sgml-data. You are saying it's an outdated version >and should be updated?
Yes: according to http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xhtml1-20020801/, >XHTML� 1.0 The Extensible HyperText Markup Language (Second Edition) >A Reformulation of HTML 4 in XML 1.0 >W3C Recommendation 26 January 2000, revised 1 August 2002 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >As for XHTML 1.1, see bugs 139058 (WNPP) and the improperly closed >89217. I am not willing to add additional large complex DTDs into >sgml-data. XHTML should be packaged separately; in fact, I would >prefer if someone would do this, taking both XHTML 1.0 and XHTML 1.1 >so I can remove XHTML 1.0 from sgml-data. Ok -- since XHTML 1.0 is already in sgml-data, I didn't even think about looking for a RFP. >As for SVG, is it small and simple enough that it's silly to package >it separately? I guess so. If it should be in sgml-data, please file >a wishlist on sgml-data requesting it be added; if it should be it's >own package, file a request as appropriate on WNPP (reportbug can help >with WNPP requests). I'll file in a wishlist bug. >We really do need a volunteer to package XHTML. If no one volunteers, >I can do it, but I'm not a good candidate since I don't use XHTML. >OTOH, DTD packages are damn easy to maintain and change infrequently, >and I have a lot of experience with them. I see that someone has volunteered; I'm also happy to do it if needed. Fr�d�ric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
