Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Looking at /usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/xsl/nwalsh/extensions/, > there are saxon643.jar, saxon644.jar, saxon651.jar, saxon65.jar, > xalan2.jar. But I think jar does not have to be there. > > You can have a look at the section 2.4 Java Librairies[1] of the Java > Policy. > > I do not know if you already discuss this on the list and forget me if > it's the case. I did not want to fill a bug if it is not necessary! > > A proposal can be to put the librairies in /usr/share/java with the > name: > > docbook-[parser]-[version]-extension.jar > > (maybe it's too long?)
It is a bit. There are reasons to keep the upstream JAR name, e.g., for XML building scripts that use this. OTOH, I agree jarfiles in /usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/xsl/nwalsh/extensions/ should be symlinks, and tha the Java shipped with the docbook-xsl package should comply with the Debian Java policy. Can you file a bug against docbook-xsl outlining the current non-compliance? One might go even further and break out the Java into separate packages depending on the processor in question, e.g., a certain version of saxon, a certain version of xalan2.... -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
