-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Adam DiCarlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > > A proposal can be to put the librairies in /usr/share/java with > > the name: > > > > docbook-[parser]-[version]-extension.jar > > > > (maybe it's too long?) > > It is a bit. ;-) > There are reasons to keep the upstream JAR name, e.g., > for XML building scripts that use this. OK, but they should go to the /usr/share/java/... to find the java librairies :-) > OTOH, I agree jarfiles in > /usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/xsl/nwalsh/extensions/ should be > symlinks, and tha the Java shipped with the docbook-xsl package > should comply with the Debian Java policy. Well you can also make symlinks with the same name and another symlin with a more 'compliant' name (according to the java policy). > Can you file a bug against docbook-xsl outlining the current > non-compliance? Well, I collect the informations and fill a bug. I'll CC it to the debian-java mailing list to get some informations from the java guru's. > One might go even further and break out the Java into separate > packages depending on the processor in question, e.g., a certain > version of saxon, a certain version of xalan2.... Do the packages aren't separated yet? saxon643.jar, saxon644.jar, saxon651.jar, saxon65.jar, xalan2.jar? I don't understand, sorry. The bug is against the �docbook-xml� packages? Thank you for the great job. - -- Arnaud Vandyck <http://vbstefi60.fapse.ulg.ac.be/~arnaud/> <http://www.ulg.ac.be/cgi-bin/ph/search?id=u184137> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE+JYOd4vzFZu62tMIRAhQ8AKCCtuVfCPr07vYqMFJINKB38eV2xwCgrI8q HmUgoDVCcecTmSdQFmtAXj4= =dtUJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
