Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm with Mark here. If I have XML data going in > /usr/share/xml/docbook/4.0/ for instance, obviously I'll have my XML > catalog, /usr/share/xml/docbook/4.0/catalog.xml. Doesn't it also make > sense to have my SGML catalog, /usr/share/xml/docbook/4.0/catalog ? > > Seems to make sense to me, as a user or as a package maintainer.
Yes, I agree - but this is not what system creators (Daniel?) have had in mind. In the past they said XML files only should go into the /usr/share/xml hierarchy. Thus a full blown XML system can slurp in all the files without any problem and build a cache or something like that from it. Problem: DTDs are not XML files neither... The new proposal isn't that helpfull. Okay, it is just "(optional)". > Lets not overcomplicate matters please. I don't see any reason why > SGML catalogs cannot reside in /usr/share/xml/.... Remember the > catalog is just the registration of some content (a DTD or entity > file). That is to say, its metadata. Whether the *content* itself is > SGML or XML should determine whether it goes in /usr/share/sgml or > /usr/share/xml . Yes, but the problem is, it isn't a proper XML file... Another question: where to move "website" by Norm? Under /usr/share/xml/website/dtd/2.5.0 or /usr/share/xml/docbook/dtd/website-2.5.0 (since it is a docbook customization)? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
