On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 08:06:58AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Karl Eichwalder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > In the past they said XML files only should go into the > > /usr/share/xml hierarchy.[...]Problem: DTDs are not XML files > > neither... > > First time I've ever heard this (rather wacky) assertion. I've always > been told /usr/share/xml is just an XML version of /usr/share/sgml. > Not to contain SGML or XML documents, necessarily, but concrete > references (declaration), DTDs, etc.
I have to agree with Adam here. If we restrict the content of /usr/share/xml to XML _documents_ only, the filesystem layout would get downright wacky. Though the idea you propose has some theoretical appeal, it's just not practical from an implementation standpoint. Thanks for your input, though:) It's always good to get fresh perspectives. My $0.02, Mark > After all, XML DTDs are defined by the XML standard. > > -- > ...Adam Di Carlo...<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.......<URL:http://www.onshored.com/> > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ------------------------------------- Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian XML/SGML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: <http://dulug.duke.edu/~mark/> GPG fp: DBEA FA3C C46A 70B5 F120 568B 89D5 4F61 C07D E242 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
