> > > > > > I believe the docbook package must conflict with docbook-xml . Anyone > > > know for sure? > >
They don't conflict. And DocBook XML 4.1 appears to be compatible with DocBk XML 3.1.7 -- all my 3.1.7 files have validated under 4.1 (so far). Why not package them together as is done with the SGML versions? The Simplified XML version 4.0.1 would be a nice addition to such a package, too. If so, the catalog bug in the current docbook-xml should probably get fixed: it puts 3.1.3 in the system catalog instead of 3.1.7. Easy fix. Cheers, Mark > > I only included the SGML material in my NMU of docbook 4. As there's no > > tarball of those files, and we have to get them 1 by 1, I'm not sure it is > > worthwhile to have both SGML and XML in the same package. Especially they > > seem to evolved not synchronously when it comes to dot-dot releases: XML has > > one scheduled, whereas SGML has not. > > > > Just my 2 pence, > > -- > > Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ? > > debian-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux: > > | Cheaper, more Powerful, more Stable ! > > http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/> > > > >
