Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Annoying. I wonder -- I think it may be a bug in the xml.dcl file. > > Have you tried it with opensp ? > > No, I haven't.
Same results. Under these conditions you will get the error: > nsgmls -wxml -wall -gues /usr/lib/sgml/declaration/xml.dcl qaml-faq.xml nsgmls:/usr/lib/sgml/declaration/xml.dcl:1:W: SGML declaration was not implied > onsgmls -wxml -wall -gues /usr/lib/sgml/declaration/xml.dcl qaml-faq.xml onsgmls:/usr/lib/sgml/declaration/xml.dcl:1:W: SGML declaration was not implied This is actually legitimate. Not using an implicit declaration is actually an error in XML! Go figure. You have two alternatives: 1) Run nsgmls or onsgmls without -wxml > nsgmls -wall -gues /usr/lib/sgml/declaration/xml.dcl qaml-faq.xml > onsgmls -wall -gues /usr/lib/sgml/declaration/xml.dcl qaml-faq.xml 2) Run onsgmls given a DTD that has the proper DTDDECL defined in the SGML catalog: > onsgmls -wxml -wall -gues qaml-faq.xml Sorry. That's the way the standard works. This is not an OpenSP or SP bug. I think it's kinda dodgy that psgml mode doesn't do the right thing, however. On the validation step, I think, psgml should probably just not use -wxml (-wall is ok though). Someone wanna file a psgml bug on that? -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
