Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > You have two alternatives: > > > > 1) Run nsgmls or onsgmls without -wxml > > > > > nsgmls -wall -gues /usr/lib/sgml/declaration/xml.dcl qaml-faq.xml > > > onsgmls -wall -gues /usr/lib/sgml/declaration/xml.dcl qaml-faq.xml > > Ah. Pretend it's SGML.
Hmm. Yah, I guess that's kinda what we're doing. I'm still not totally certain what part of the XML spec is involved here... I guess I should go back and read it ... > > 2) Run onsgmls given a DTD that has the proper DTDDECL defined in the > > SGML catalog: > > > > > onsgmls -wxml -wall -gues qaml-faq.xml > > OK. opensp wasn't in potato, if I recall. Nope. > > Sorry. That's the way the standard works. This is not an OpenSP or > > SP bug. > > I was trying to follow the instructions in the potato version. > Following the instructions in the woody version is much more > successful, so I'm gonna close this bug report. > > > I think it's kinda dodgy that psgml mode doesn't do the right thing, > > however. On the validation step, I think, psgml should probably just > > not use -wxml (-wall is ok though). Someone wanna file a psgml bug on > > that? > > Do you want to? Otherwise I will. Please go ahead, Julian. Thanks. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
