Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > / Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > | Thoughts? I know it's a little sketchy feeling to be moving catalogs > | into the dir with entities and dtds, but I think it really is easier > | to manage, closer to upstream, etc. And lets face it, upstream SGML > | catalogs for specific SGML/XML packages are not really user > | configuration files at all anyhow, are they? > > N.B. if you put a file called 'catalog' in a directory, you cannot > prevent some SGML systems (e.g, SP and it's relatives) from using it > if any SGML or XML file is opened from that directory.
I wonder if that's a problem for us. People should never be working out of that directory.... OTOH perhaps you can never be too paranoid. I don't know if we wanna try to standardize that catalog name -- seems a bit silly / overreaching. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
